Alistair
04-06-2007, 08:30 PM
Might seem an odd place to put this but there is a connection - read on.
NPR is currently asking people to tell them what they want to learn about climate change. I am not a US citizen so they might ignore my note but for those that are in the US, please ask about the relationship between greenhouse gases and livestock.
Please ask your question here. (http://www.npr.org/contact/climate.html)
My note to them is below.
I saw the reports of the UN FAO, talking about "the long shadow of livestock" making more greenhouse gas than transport. Since then I have heard a little about methane being a critical greenhouse gas that has it's main effects in the first 20 years, making it 60 times more potent than CO2, but because it is looked at over 100 years, the effect is only quoted as about 20 times stronger than CO2.
If this is the case, doesn't this mean that we could have a significant effect on global warming in our lifetimes by cutting down on methane emissions? Since livestock are one of the largest methane sources; maybe we should stop breeding the huge herds that the UN FAO was referring to.
I would like to learn more about the impact that could be made in the short term, if we limited the dependence on livestock.
NPR is currently asking people to tell them what they want to learn about climate change. I am not a US citizen so they might ignore my note but for those that are in the US, please ask about the relationship between greenhouse gases and livestock.
Please ask your question here. (http://www.npr.org/contact/climate.html)
My note to them is below.
I saw the reports of the UN FAO, talking about "the long shadow of livestock" making more greenhouse gas than transport. Since then I have heard a little about methane being a critical greenhouse gas that has it's main effects in the first 20 years, making it 60 times more potent than CO2, but because it is looked at over 100 years, the effect is only quoted as about 20 times stronger than CO2.
If this is the case, doesn't this mean that we could have a significant effect on global warming in our lifetimes by cutting down on methane emissions? Since livestock are one of the largest methane sources; maybe we should stop breeding the huge herds that the UN FAO was referring to.
I would like to learn more about the impact that could be made in the short term, if we limited the dependence on livestock.