PDA

View Full Version : US neuroscientist rails against Oxford lab


paul
01-22-2007, 04:28 PM
Alexandra Smith
Monday January 22, 2007
EducationGuardian.co.uk

A leading neuroscientist and Oxford graduate has stepped into the debate over animal testing in a highly critical paper that condemns the university's controversial laboratory.

Writing for Animal Aid, the UK's largest animal rights group, Marius Maxwell, a neurosurgeon at a specialist spine centre in the US, said the minority of Oxford animal researchers were "tirelessly promoting their claimed achievements before the media".

He said: "Many of my Oxford colleagues in world-class scientific laboratories, and in the humanities, are privately aghast at the ability of a small group of media-savvy vivisectionists to hold the debate hostage and thereby besmirch the international reputation of their university."

Dr Maxwell's comments come just days after Pro-Test, the Oxford-based group backing animal testing, said three letter bombs had been sent to research companies in Oxfordshire and Birmingham.

Pro-Test said the first bomb was sent to Cellmark, in Abingdon, Oxfordshire, last Thursday. It failed to detonate properly and resulted in minor injuries. The other two letter bombs were understood to have been sent to companies in Culham, Oxfordshire, and Chelmsey Wood, in Birmingham, but were discovered before detonation, according to Pro-Test.

Iain Simpson, spokesman for the group, said: "Following a series of attacks in which a woman could easily have been very seriously injured, Speak and Peta [animal rights groups] need to come out and condemn these attacks if they are to have any credibility. Both claim to be legitimate organisations interested only in peaceful campaigning. If this is the case surely they will join us in condemning these barbaric attacks."

The construction of the £20m animal research laboratory at the University of Oxford has been dogged with controversy.

In July 2004, the construction firm Montpellier pulled out after threatening letters were sent to its shareholders and its share price dropped. Work on the lab was suspended because of continuing threats of violence.

In the same month, the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) admitted to an arson attack on the Hertford College boathouse and joined another animal rights group, Speak, in a campaign to target any organisations linked to the university.

In his opinion piece, Dr Maxwell, who studied at Cambridge, Oxford and Harvard universities and is now based in the US, refuted the findings of the recent Weatherall report on primate vivisection, which advocated the use of animals for research, as "profoundly flawed".

Dr Maxwell has thrown his weight behind groups, such as Europeans For Medical Progress, campaigning for safer, humane alternatives to animal testing, according to Animal Aid. He has also joined the call by Voice for Ethical Research at Oxford (Vero) - a growing group of dons and graduates, including Ann Widdecombe and Tony Benn - for the university's new animal lab site to be turned into a "world-class medical imaging and research centre".

Dr Maxwell said vivisectionists were "swimming against the tide of international medical and ethical opinion. I fear that history will judge their animal rights opponents as less extreme than the very scientists who persist in non-human primate research in the face of an increasing body of consistent and compelling evidence that the resulting data has and will continue to endanger countless human lives."

Gliondrach
01-22-2007, 04:31 PM
Good man. Imaging techniques are the way to find out what goes on in the human brain.

Bowwowmeow
01-22-2007, 04:49 PM
He said: "Many of my Oxford colleagues in world-class scientific laboratories, and in the humanities, are privately aghast at the ability of a small group of media-savvy vivisectionists to hold the debate hostage and thereby besmirch the international reputation of their university." This is true. Its so unlike what I have always thought of when I think of Oxford that I can't shake the impression that it is really some other Oxford, and not the real one. :confused: :dizzy:

Dr Maxwell's comments come just days after Pro-Test, the Oxford-based group backing animal testing, said three letter bombs had been sent to research companies in Oxfordshire and Birmingham.

Pro-Test said the first bomb was sent to Cellmark, in Abingdon, Oxfordshire, last Thursday. It failed to detonate properly and resulted in minor injuries. The other two letter bombs were understood to have been sent to companies in Culham, Oxfordshire, and Chelmsey Wood, in Birmingham, but were discovered before detonation, according to Pro-Test.

Iain Simpson, spokesman for the group, said: "Following a series of attacks in which a woman could easily have been very seriously injured, Speak and Peta [animal rights groups] need to come out and condemn these attacks if they are to have any credibility. Both claim to be legitimate organisations interested only in peaceful campaigning. If this is the case surely they will join us in condemning these barbaric attacks." Of course it doesn't occur to anyone to suspect Pro-Test itself of sending these bombs in order to make PETA and SPEAK look guilty of something they would never dream of doing themselves. The very fact that they were discovered before detonation makes me suspect that they were not sent by anyone who truly wanted to put a stop to the activities of the lab people. It reminds me of that case where a woman wanted to murder her children, and shot herself in the arm to make it look like she was attacked. She knew she would survive her own self-inflicted injury, and she had to do something to make herself look innocent of murdering her children. If a stranger really had shot her, he would have shot her as dead as her children were shot. Likewise, it seems to me that the kinds of people who want to keep being able to conduct brutal, savage experimentation on animals wouldn't hesitate to risk minor harm to a few of their "colleagues" in order to put the blame on the people who are fighting against them. The public is under the mistaken impression that this kind of research is conducted by people who care about human health and well-being. They care only for money, and since they have no regard for all non-human life, its pretty unlikely that they care about human life, either, if those humans are interfering with their ability to make monetary gains from their savage activities.

Gliondrach
01-22-2007, 05:12 PM
Quite possibly they were staged. I wouldn't put anything past the type of people who torture and terrorise for a living. Our governments use black operations all the time and these people are closely linked to the governments. We know that governments and drug companies/medical researchers have demonstrated the most appalling cruelty and callousness, to humans as well as non-humans. Their mendacity and corruption are worse than is found in organised crime gangs.

If these bombs were sent by AR people, I'm glad that no one was seriously hurt. I don't know if the three companies are involved in vivisection but, if they are, it is understandable that someone would feel so strongly as to try to harm them. Understandable but not condonable.

Oracl
01-22-2007, 09:28 PM
Dr Maxwell said.......history will judge their animal rights opponents as less extreme than the very scientists who persist in non-human primate research
I believe this will be the case. :agree:

thevegantwins
01-23-2007, 07:14 AM
So true on all above points. I just read an article on the NY Times today regarding the use of niacin to lower LDL (bad cholesterol) and raise HDL (good cholesterol). The study used human subjects :yea: and the results very much supported the theory that niacin is a fantastic supplement for those with high cholesterol, like me. The article even mentioned how the pharmaceutical companies have not bothered looking into niacin because they can't make money off of a vitamin, they continue to vivisect and push those evil statin drugs because they are :devil4:

Gliondrach
01-23-2007, 04:38 PM
That's true about the drug companies and vitamin and herbal products. They even conduct tests with the wrong doses of vitamins or wrong isolated constituents of herbs and, when they fail - as they will because they are not used properly - they claim that vitamins and herbs are no good.

But, to be on the safe side, many supplement producers are now owned by drug companies. The drug companies know that people are too clever to believe their lies about nutritional supplements, and they want to make a profit from people who don't trust their drugs.