PDA

View Full Version : Saluting Cindy Sheehan


1vegan
05-30-2007, 07:48 AM
progressive.org (http://www.progressive.org/mag_wx052907)

More than any person in America, Cindy Sheehan galvanized the peace movement. As a mother who lost her son Casey to the war and would not remain silent, she enabled millions of Americans to see this hideous war for what it was.

Along the way, she’s been called every ugly name on the Net, which seems to traffic in misogynistic crudities and computer screen snipers.

Rightwing talk show host Phil Hendrie called her an “ignorant cow.”

People on the freerepublic.com site called her a “traitor,” and an “insane, psychopathic bitch.”

On another site, she was called a “seditious cunt.”

Others mocked her grief, with one saying: “Just shit out another kid to take Casey’s place.”

(Her resignation was greeted with more of the same on the freerepublic.com site. One person called her “Momma Wacko,” and another wrote, “I hope the b**** gets hit by a bus.”)

Through it all, Cindy Sheehan maintained her dignity, her clear head, her courage, and her passion.

Never one to play the political game, she attacked Democrats who fronted for this war, and she threw herself into the effort to impeach Bush and Cheney.

Now she’s calling it quits, at least for a while.

On Memorial Day, she submitted what she called her “ ‘resignation letter’ as the ‘face’ of the American anti-war movement.”

When she dared to criticize Democrats, she wrote, she started to get the “same slurs that the right used,” only this time from the left, by which she means the compromisers and capitulators and their apologists within the Democratic Party.

She said she’s tired of the in-fighting within the peace movement, disgusted, understandably, with the Democrats, and thoroughly dejected about the possibility of ending this war and rescuing this country.

“Casey died for a country which cares more about who will be the next American Idol than how many people will be killed in the next few months while Democrats and Republicans play politics with human lives,” she wrote. And she added: “George Bush will never be impeached.”

She has sacrificed immensely to try to end this war. She lost her son, her marriage of 29 years fell apart, and she has endured more slings and arrows than anyone ever deserved.

Now she wants to spend more time with her surviving children, and who can blame her for that?

“I am going to take whatever I have left and go home,” she wrote. “I am going to go home and be a mother to my surviving children and try to regain what I have lost. I will try to maintain and nurture some very positive relationships that I have found in the journey that I was forced into when Casey died and try to repair some of the ones that have fallen apart since I began this single-minded crusade to try and change a paradigm that is now, I am afraid, carved in immovable, unbendable, and rigidly mendacious marble.”

I’m not as despairing as Cindy Sheehan is. Howard Zinn teaches us that even the seemingly most immovable systems can crumble at surprising moments, if we keep pushing. But I certainly understand how Cindy Sheehan could arrive at her conclusion. And I can sense the exhaustion in her letter.

“I have spent every available cent . . . [and] have used all my energy trying to stop this country from slaughtering innocent human beings,” she wrote, concluding a little later: “This system forcefully resists being helped and eats up the people who try to help it. I am getting out before it totally consumes me or any more people that I love and the rest of my resources.”

Cindy Sheehan is burned out. Not many people could have kept going at that speed. Maybe Ralph Nader could have. Maybe Amy Goodman could have. But that may be it.

The rest of us need our down time, diversions, balance, and hobbies. To be “single-minded,” as Cindy Sheehan herself found out, is unsustainable for most mortals.

So I’m glad, for her sake, that Cindy Sheehan is going home to regroup and recupe.

But I’m saddened for the peace movement, and for the country.

Yet I don’t think we’ve seen the last of Cindy Sheehan. I certainly hope not. She’s an extraordinarily decent, selfless, and courageous person.

“This is not my ‘Checkers’ moment,” she writes, “because I will never give up trying to help people in the world who are harmed by the empire of the good old US of A.”

We all owe Cindy Sheehan a huge debt of gratitude for all that she has contributed.

I wish her happiness and comfort and relaxation and love and laughter in her days ahead.

And I look forward to joining hands with her again somewhere down the road.

How do you view or see that news?

As european, I found this part interesting
“Casey died for a country which cares more about who will be the next American Idol than how many people will be killed in the next few months while Democrats and Republicans play politics with human lives,” she wrote.

As I european, I don't really understand why, or how "america"(bush) can go on like this. I know it's not realistic to pull out of Iraq now, but this has cost american people so much.

If I've done my math right, then it's about 1200 dollar per american spent on the iraq war so far.

thevegantwins
05-30-2007, 08:12 AM
Cindy Sheehan is right; Americans do care more about the next American Idol. One of the reasons why me and Mr. TVT are so anti-television/commercial radio is that the american media has so much power and it is terrifying how people can be brainwashed into believing what is important news and what should or shouldn't be important to themselves and their families.

I can not imagine how anyone believes today that the Iraq war was just and yet so many millions still believe it is so and that Bush is a great president.

IndyVegan
05-30-2007, 09:21 PM
it is very realistic to pull out of iraq now. the occupation has caused the mess that the country is in. the occupation troops are simply in the middle of a sectarian struggle for power. as bad as saddam was, he had control over that nation to the point that there were not people blowing themselves up in the middle of crowded markets, mosques, whatever. "al-qaeda" wasn't there either.

cindy is a wonderful soul and i salute her. she is a true hero.

although, i cannot see why she never got behind dennis kucinich. i sincerely hope all those who followed her would get behind him. if people do not want to see iraq raped of their oil in favor of multi-national corporations, are tired of seeing iraqi's die by the hundreds of thousands, and are tired of seeing their occupation troops slaughtered on a daily basis for being pawns in bush's game, they'll get behind him.

Gliondrach
05-31-2007, 03:47 AM
Someone called her a traitor? Bush and his cronies are the traitors. Profitable traitors, no doubt.

dreamer
05-31-2007, 11:27 AM
Unfortunately lots of people here who still love Bush (which is a smaller % than ever b4) call anyone who talks about leaving Iraq--or that we NEVER should have gone there--lots of names: traitors, unAmerican, unpatriotic, etc. I personally always thought it was stupid to go into Iraq, but the moment Bush was elected (b4 9/11), I thought we would go into Iraq--as Sadaam tried to kill his "daddy." I think people here are finally realizing how much of a mess we've created, though it took them far too long to "catch on" IMO.

1vegan
05-31-2007, 12:17 PM
it is very realistic to pull out of iraq now. the occupation has caused the mess that the country is in. the occupation troops are simply in the middle of a sectarian struggle for power.

I don't think it's realistic to pull out now, if the U.S does, they will be double blamed for the situation, and that will backfire even more on the U.S

The struggle Iraq is in now, is mostly caused by the U.S in the first place. (as I sorta predicted before the war started)


I also have my doubts if a next goverment will be able to change things significantly in or outside the U.S.
In my opinon, the "two party" system makes it that there is never a common ground in the u.s politics.

The way the U.S political system seems to work, makes it possible to block changes. Like the supreme court can control or overturn legislation, and those people seem to get into the supreme court on basis of buddies.

The next goverments will have to deal with the installments for the loans bush took to finance the war. And that will limit what they can do for americans.

I seriously doubt a democrat president will be a serious change.
America is too much run by big companies, bucks and buddies.

And I guess the american public is sick of it, or just doesn't care, cause I don't understand why stuff about election fraud is (was) out of the news so easily. In my view, Cindy is sort of saying there is no freedom of speech in th e U.S (when it comes to politics), or like bush says "you're with us or against s" and that seems to work that way in the U.S political parties too. :(

Also, with all the issues going on in the '04 elections, still a relative low number or percentage of voters turned up, so have the people are too rich to care, or they have just given up on the U.S political system?

From a european point of view, it seems the U.S has a voting system that's
"one dollar, one vote"; meaning, he who raises the most bucks for campaigning, tv commercials and so on, that person will win.
It's going to be hillary or obama, and the question is what will be the hardest barrier to go over, the first black one, or the first female one?

dreamer
09-10-2007, 04:15 PM
I'm not sure how "out of" the movement she is since she apparently got arrested today while the "Iraq is going fine" general was giving his speech to Congress;)